Register   Login   Search:  
Thursday, July 02, 2009
     
Welcome to our page of blogs. We are currently training community leaders from around the state to blog at this site too. The vast distances we face in this state can partly be bridged by this shared conversation.

Our goal is to encourage informal, positive discussion that spurs people to connect with each other and to take united action to promote democracy, justice, equality and freedom. Idahoans have played an important role in the progressive movement in the US and we will continue to do so. Because Idaho is overlooked and dismissed by national pundits, the work of our local leaders is more resilient, creative and authentic. Join us!
Donate
Donate now to United Action for Idaho!

Your generous donations make this work possible.

To make a donation, call us at 208-331-7028 and we will take your information over the phone.
Or, mail your check to:

United Action for Idaho
P.O. Box 1581
Boise, ID 83701

Thank You!


Please note, United Action for Idaho is a non-profit, 501(c)4 organiztion. Donations to UAI are not tax deductible. If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation, visit our sister organization, United Vision for Idaho. Thank you.
Blogs
Mar 12

Written by: Jim Hansen
Wednesday, March 12, 2008

There is a good case to be made that the administrative cost for small businesses to comply with the so-called "personal property" tax (on equipment, etc.) is not worth the revenue it generates. Big corporations have been able to handle it for decades and what they contribute to support Idaho's schools and other assets through this tax makes up for the fact that many of them don't pay sales tax on the purchase of equipment under the production exemption.

Lobbyists for the big corporations (Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry - IACI), however, need the sympathetic small businesses as their cover so they can get the entire "personal property" tax repealed. They don't seem the least bit concerned that a complete repeal will drain $120 million from Idaho's budget, will make it harder for Idaho to invest in assets that help everyone (like decent schools and public safety) and will shift more tax burden on individuals and homeowners. House Bill 599 does just that.

But this morning, a group of 8 legislators took the "small business administrative burden" rationale at face value and proposed amending the bill so that the repeal only applied to the first $50,000 of value. That would cover the vast majority of businesses and only cost about $10 million.

IACI panicked at the prospect of such an amendment. Big corporations need small businesses as their cover to secure this windfall. If the link is broken, it will be much harder to come back in future years to try to repeal the rest. They also know that this is an election year and that many legislators have accepted contributions from big corporations, their PACs and lobbyists in the past and will want to again this year. Most small businesses don't have the money to create a PAC let alone hire a lobbyist.

Enough legislators blinked and the amendment failed on a 8-10 vote. Siding with small businesses and the individual taxpayers of Idaho were all five Democrats plus three Republicans. All ten who sided with IACI were Republicans.

The bill still has to clear a vote by the full House (probably this Friday) and then be go through the Senate. Yesterday, a Senate committee, feeling the impact of a tight budget riddled with tax exemptions, voted to cut health benefits for retirees.

Tags:

2 comments so far...

Re: More tax shifts to benefit big corporations

Hey, Jim: Loved your description of the amendment. It's great to see the weasels squirm, even if they're constituants don't know about it. However, the Rs do have have one valid point in the corporate tax debate -- businesses don't pay taxes, they just collect them. And as a Dem, I think the trajedy is that the public is unaware of the 30%+/- tax they pay in the price of everything they buy. The problem isn't that businesses are under-taxed, it's that they're over-subsidized.
The last 60 years have unequivocally demonstrated that the fiscally conservative party IS the Dems, so shouldn't we in Idaho stress that advantage? One way we could do that is to replace income & property taxes with a consumption tax, both locally and nationally -- The "FairTax" concept (with it's "pre-fund" & relatively low administrative costs) provides a good starting point for creating an efficient progressive tax structure. I have some ideas for tweaking the concept that I'd love to discuss with you or some of your other experts.

By Tom Faull, Horseshoe Bend Committeeman Candidate on   Monday, April 21, 2008

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment    Cancel  
List of Blogs
Links to Idaho blogs
Links to NW Blogs
© 2009 United Action for Idaho   Terms Of Use   Privacy Statement