Register   Login   Search:  
Friday, December 05, 2008
     
Welcome to our page of blogs. We are currently training community leaders from around the state to blog at this site too. The vast distances we face in this state can partly be bridged by this shared conversation.

Our goal is to encourage informal, positive discussion that spurs people to connect with each other and to take united action to promote democracy, justice, equality and freedom. Idahoans have played an important role in the progressive movement in the US and we will continue to do so. Because Idaho is overlooked and dismissed by national pundits, the work of our local leaders is more resilient, creative and authentic. Join us!
Donate
Donate now to United Action for Idaho!

Your generous donations make this work possible.

To make a donation, call us at 208-331-7028 and we will take your information over the phone.
Or, mail your check to:

United Action for Idaho
P.O. Box 1581
Boise, ID 83701

Thank You!


Please note, United Action for Idaho is a non-profit, 501(c)4 organiztion. Donations to UAI are not tax deductible. If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation, visit our sister organization, United Vision for Idaho. Thank you.
Blogs
May 15

Written by: Jim Hansen
Tuesday, May 15, 2007

I'm always amused when elected officials - who often vote for huge tax cuts and allow the federal deficit to reach new heights - like to be around when public funds are being dispensed. Yesterday, our state governor flew around Idaho to preseent federal grant checks totalling $6.1 million to 16 local governments. Thanks Betsy Russel for putting this in your Eye on Boise blog yesterday.

I like the idea that public officials associate themselves with the investment of public money (tax money) into public infrastructure (even if they didn't have much if anything to do with the communtity actually getting the grant). I spoke with folks in Salmon this morning and that was one of the cities Gov. Otter visted yesterday to "present" receiving their federal grant.

In additiona to basking in the value of the investment, these public officials have a moral obligation to point out three critical things:

  • that investment in this kind of infrastructure is LESS than what our parents and grandparents generation invested,
  • that tax policies favoring wealthy private interests have undermined our capacity to provide public investment and
  • that some states are being forced to actually SELL to wealthy private interests the very public investments we paid for.

In the 1950's, 60's and 70's there was substantial public investment in things that made economic growth in our communities - especially small communities - possible: sewer systems, hospitals, fire stations, airports, reclamation projects, etc... This kind of invesment is as American as the apple pie. It also tends to benefit everyone rather than just a few wealthy power brokers. It was paid for by tax dollars and the more you benefited by American capitalism, the more you were expected to invest through tax dollars in the infrastructure that benefited everyone.

Formerly, our government expected wealthy corporations and individuals to be partners in building communities. Today, our government is finding ways to help wealthy corporations and individuals build bigger fortunes. One way is by selling them our community infrastructure.

Business Week reported last week that Wall Street bankers and investment firms are rushing to raise cash to buy out public assets. It reports that when Goldman Sachs estimated it needed $3 milllion to capitalize its new infrastructure fund, private interests rushed in with $6.5 million. What are they investing in? Public infrastructure we have already paid for with tax money. Pennsylvania is preparing to privatize its famous Turnpike. Indiana already has. The Business Week story provides some sobering examples such as the pending long-term lease of the Colorado Northwest Parkway - paid for with massive public investment - to a group of Portugese and Brazilian investors.

Sam Pizzigati writing for a great on-line weekly called Too Much: A Commentary on Excess and Inequality picked up on the story and notes that: "governors and lawmakers, unwilling to tax the rich to maintain America's roads, are now taking bids to sell these roads to the rich."

I have noticed that in Idaho, since the decline of public investment in things like roads, schools, clinics and sewer systems, it is amazing how small communities hang on. It probably comes as no surprise for them to see state and federal governments turning to private investors - most of whom probably have never set foot in our communities - to buy out the infrastucure we've already paid for.

Who is government serving?

Tags:

2 comments so far...

Re: Will our public infrastructure be sold off too?

Jim,

Thank you for describing the issues. I can understand these issues and others because I take the time to understand them. The solution is for ordinary people to participate in our govenment.

Can you help with three solutions? (1) How to help ordinary people understand the issues? (2) How to identify the fundamental reason that a legislator votes on an issue? I hypothesize that something more basic than Democrat, Republican, Independent, or other, is the reason a legislator votes. (3) How to help ordinary people to participate in our government?

Wendy Jaquet is coming to Salmon on July 22 to explain how a bill bocomes law and how a bill does not--like the Fair Elections bill, brucellosis, food tax, property tax. I am wondering what we can say to people in Salmon so that they will come. After you cross the Salmon River going North on route 93, the go straight up the hill (not 93, which turns right), take the first left, which is Fulton. The first house on the left is where the meeting will be on Sunday evening, July 22. All are welcome.

By Calvin Leman on   Thursday, May 17, 2007

Re: Will our public infrastructure be sold off too?

I think an answer to all three questions lies in creating genuine relationships between people (groups of people on the community level) and the people that represent them in government. Those relationships should not be exclusive (i.e. so that I get what I want but leave our my neighbor) and they should acknowledge imbalances of power that already exist (economic, education, cultural) so that everyone is truly invited to participate.

Then, of course, people need to practice the art (sport might be a better metaphor - in its positive, community-spirited, competitive sense) of participating in elections.

By Jim Hansen on   Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment    Cancel  
List of Blogs
Links to Idaho blogs
Links to NW Blogs
© 2008 United Action for Idaho   Terms Of Use   Privacy Statement